Visitor Circulation Patterns in Mountain Tourism Areas: A Comparative Study of Ketep Pass, Puncak Suroloyo, and Nepal Van Java
Keywords:
architectural circulation, mountain tourism, spatial morphology, sustainable planning, visitor circulationAbstract
Mountain tourism destinations represent environmentally sensitive landscapes characterized by steep terrain, limited accessibility, and dynamic visitor movement patterns. In many Indonesian highland tourism areas, circulation systems evolve without comprehensive spatial integration, resulting in congestion, pedestrian–vehicle conflicts, safety risks, and diminished visitor experience. This study aims to identify, classify, and comparatively analyze visitor circulation patterns in three mountain tourism destinations in the Magelang region: Ketep Pass, Puncak Suroloyo, and Nepal Van Java. A qualitative descriptive-comparative approach was employed through a literature review, field observation, spatial mapping, and classification of circulation typologies. The analytical framework integrates architectural circulation theory and sustainable tourism principles. The findings reveal three distinct typologies: formal linear-structured circulation (Ketep Pass), topography-adaptive linear-natural circulation (Puncak Suroloyo), and community-integrated linear circulation (Nepal Van Java). The study demonstrates that circulation morphology is influenced by terrain gradient, infrastructure planning intensity, and socio-spatial integration. This research contributes a contextual circulation model for mountain tourism planning that emphasizes terrain responsiveness, pedestrian prioritization, and community participation to achieve sustainable spatial development.
Downloads
References
M. H. Salas-Olmedo, B. Moya-Gómez, J. C. García-Palomares, and J. Gutiérrez, “Tourists’ digital footprint in cities: Comparing Big Data sources,” Tour. Manag., vol. 66, pp. 13–25, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.001.
P. Martí, C. García-Mayor, and L. Serrano-Estrada, “Taking the urban tourist activity pulse through digital footprints,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 157–176, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1706458.
Y. Han, G. Yang, and T. Zhang, “Spatial-temporal response patterns of tourist flow under entrance tourist flow control scheme,” Tour. Manag., vol. 83, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104246.
M. Ferrante, S. De Cantis, and N. Shoval, “A general framework for collecting and analysing the tracking data of cruise passengers at the destination,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1426–1451, 2018, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2016.1194813.
J. C. Hallo, J. A. Beeco, C. Goetcheus, J. McGee, N. G. McGehee, and W. C. Norman, “GPS as a Method for Assessing Spatial and Temporal Use Distributions of Nature-Based Tourists,” J. Travel Res., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 591–606, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0047287511431325.
J. Kim, B. Thapa, S. Jang, and E. Yang, “Seasonal spatial activity patterns of visitors with a mobile exercise application at Seoraksan National Park, South Korea,” Sustain., vol. 10, no. 7, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10072263.
Y. Lin, Y. Zhou, M. Lin, S. Wu, and B. Li, “Exploring the disparities in park accessibility through mobile phone data: Evidence from Fuzhou of China,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 281, no. August 2020, p. 111849, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111849.
N. Mou, Y. Zheng, T. Makkonen, T. Yang, J. Tang, and Y. Song, “Tourists’ digital footprint: The spatial patterns of tourist flows in Qingdao, China,” Tour. Manag., vol. 81, no. December 2019, p. 104151, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104151.
A. Nolasco-Cirugeda, C. García-Mayor, C. Lupu, and A. Bernabeu-Bautista, “Scoping out urban areas of tourist interest though geolocated social media data: Bucharest as a case study,” Inf. Technol. Tour., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 361–387, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40558-022-00235-8.
T. S. Andadari and D. Indrosaptono, “Sikap Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Seting Ruang Transisi Pada Mal di Semarang,” J. Arsit. NALARs Vol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2022.
T. S. Andadari, Desain dan Perilaku: Analisis Ruang Transisi Mall dari Perspektif Pejalan kaki vii, 1st ed. Indonesia, 2025.
Z. Wang, Q. Liu, J. Xu, and Y. Fujiki, “Evolution characteristics of the spatial network structure of tourism efficiency in China: A province-level analysis,” J. Destin. Mark. Manag., vol. 18, no. November 2019, p. 100509, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100509.
H. R. Dong, Q. Meng, X. M. Yao, X. X. Yang, and Q. L. Wang, “Analysis of dynamic features in intersecting pedestrian flow,” Chinese Phys. B, vol. 26, no. 9, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/9/098902.
C. Barros, B. Moya-Gómez, and J. Gutiérrez, “Using geotagged photographs and GPS tracks from social networks to analyse visitor behaviour in national parks,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1291–1310, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1619674.
Z. Yue, J. B. Burley, Z. Cui, H. Lei, and J. Zhou, “Visitor capacity considering social distancing in urban parks with agent-based modeling,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136720.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
